Shafee Abdullah sodmised Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim Najib sodmised Altantuya Shaariibuu abetted by Chief Justice and the judiciary of Malaysia

Shafee Abdullah agreed and said it is a Legal conspiracy

Under his control Shafee Abdullah Freedom for Anwar and Justice for Altantuya’s Family at last Shafee Abdullah agreed and said it is a Legal conspiracy Shafee Abdullah sodmised Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim Najib sodmised  Altantuya Shaariibuu abetted by Chief Justice and the judiciary of Malaysia Anwar verdict puts Malaysia’s justice system on trial  the most publicised trial in Malaysia’s history ended today, with Anwar Ibrahim it’s a guilty verdict, this country is ripe for a political tsunami once again. For the first time since independence, we would be sending someone to prison for five years for what is a moral offence, at best. How can we condone that, and then feel no revulsion over the way Altantuya Shaariibuu was murdered? How can we feel no necessity to explore the motives behind the heinous killing? Abdul Razak Baginda ‘is completely unimplicated’Abdul Razak Baginda, a prominent political analyst, knew the murdered Mongolian model. His lawyer, Shafee Abdullah, said he wouldn’t “go so far to say” that Abdul Razak had a relationship with Altantuya Shaariibuu, but would say that “he knows the lady.He said he met his client Wednesday morning and heard his side of the story. “I am extremely relieved from my conversation … I am totally convinced of his innocence .. he is completely unimplicated.” [Associated Press via International Herald Tribune] If you have large sections of the population believing that somehow the judiciary is not fair or impartial, then this is a very serious situation. It’s an undermining of a major national institution Ambiga said we could have easily shown by irrefutable evidence the involvement of several top politicians to bring Anwar Ibrahim down politically.Among Anwar’s nine defence lawyers, there is deep frustration that many witnesses, documents, even tapes they had ready didn’t make it to evidence, because the judge wouldn’t allow them  There was evidence of the involvement of the PM Najib, as well, that he knew this process of political conspiracy Most of the rulings where the judge could exercise discretion, went against us.MUHAMMAD SHAFEE ABDULLAH: When the trial first started, I think at least for the first two months or three, there were often times, I thought, where the judge was giving a lot of leeway to the defence.prosecutor Shafee Abdullah praises praises Chief Justice for refusing to hear Anwar’s conspiracy argument  Whether or not he committed those sexual offences he must lock upand Najib must br saved says Shafee Abdullah. But even he admits Malaysians don’t see it that way.  There are a lot of individuals out there who feel that the whole trial has gone completely bonkers. Many individuals think that Anwar did not receive a fair trial. The damage from the trial goes beyond perceptions about Government influence over the judiciary 

Shafee calls Anwar's jailing "If he did it (sodomy)  and people say we need to investigate and get him, that is a conspiracy that is against the law,""If  Anwar did it and people say we need to investigate and get him,conspiracy that is against the law,"

After successfully putting Anwar Ibrahim behind bars for sodomy, veteran lawyer Shafee Abdullah has no qualms acknowledging a conspiracy against the opposition leader. shaffe will have his downfall when the Triad Gangster Tony Puah is convicted in the states

Tamrin Ghafar. Tamrin said someone wants to meet me and it was very urgent and extremely important that I meet this person. It was agreed that we meet for tea at the Havana Club in the One World Hotel in Damansara Utama.Tamrin walked in with Datuk Kamal Amir and Datuk Kadar Shah. It was actually Datuk Kadar who wanted to see me although Tamrin did not mention that earlier when he phoned me — and I knew better than to ask over the phone considering the police were monitoring my phone calls.

Shafee Abdullah: sodomologist extraordinaire’. Shafee has since sued Raja Petra Kamarudin  for this article and in his summons-in-chamber he says that my allegation does not contain any particulars. Well, today, I will certainly give him those particulars that he seeks.

Datuk Kadar related how he had gone to lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s office a few days earlier to discuss Jamaluddin Jarjis’s bottom pinching case in the Havana Club at KL Sentral. I think Datuk Kadar was involved because he had an interest in the establishment. Anyway, I was told Shafee wanted JJ to pay RM1 million as ‘settlement’ or else his scandal was going to explode.

And this was when Datuk Kadar saw that whiteboard with Anwar Ibrahim’s and my name on it and the police officers who were in the office discussing the Anwar Ibrahim Sodomy II case. And a few days later the whole sodomy thing exploded with Saiful’s ‘revelation’ that he had been sodomised, the PUSRAWI doctor’s examination that showed Saiful was still a virgin, and Najib’s denial and later his admission that he had met Saiful prior to the sodomy allegation.

Veteran lawyer Shafee Abdullah, who helped put opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim behind bars, continued his media blitz, taking aim at former Bar Council president Ambiga Sreenevasan today.

Charge Ambiga with contempt, says Shafee

Very troubling reports have been published, which reveal the existence of a medical report of an examination done by a doctor on Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan a few hours before Saiful lodged a police report that he had been sodomised. The medical report apparently shows that there is no evidence that he had been sodomised by anyone.

Such reports raise some very serious questions that require immediate answers:

(1) Are the police in possession of such a medical report?

(2) Was the doctor concerned interviewed by the police and was he detained for any length of time?

(3) Is the doctor concerned facing any form of intimidation and, if so, by whom?

(4) Is there a medical report by another doctor that either confirms or contradicts the first medical report?

(5) If it is true that the medical report exists showing a lack of prima facie evidence, what then could have been the justification for the vigorous actions taken against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as well as the public call by the authorities for his DNA sample?

The answers to these questions are of paramount importance, as they bring into focus the integrity of our law enforcement system.

These latest disclosures regarding the investigations into the sodomy allegations are not the only ones to raise questions that need answering. There is, for example, also the issue of P. Balasubramaniam’s abrupt “disappearance” that has yet to be satisfactorily explained. No one can deny that the circumstances of his first and second statutory declarations are highly unusual. All these show a pattern of events that cause much disquiet to right-thinking members of the public.

The Malaysian people are deeply troubled. A country that truly believes in the rule of law should not be faced with so many disturbing developments and unanswered questions.

The credibility of the Malaysian justice system as a whole is therefore at stake. The integrity of professionals, be they doctors or lawyers, must never be interfered with. The public must be left in no doubt that the criminal justice system in this country will not be misused or abused. There must be nothing less than an open and thorough investigation into these cases. This calls for the courage and professionalism of all those involved to do the right thing no matter the consequences. And those who have shown such courage and integrity must know that they live in a country where it is safe to do so.

Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan readmore last Shafee Abdullah agreed and said it is a Legal conspiracy