Intolerant behaviour by Shafee Abdullah and (AG) Abdul Gani Patail’can do immense damage to our reputation as a mature, liberal democracy and
Pardon the crassness, folks, but some things need to be said. I am 58 and I find it increasingly difficult to have sex with my wife of 30 years.Anwar, who is 10 years older, can have anal sex, forcibly, with Saiful? I find it laughable and physically impossible and I don't suffer from a bad back.
Judiciary must ensure that allegations like this are probed quickly
A cursory look at the timeline of the allegations and cases
Attorney-general (AG) Abdul Gani Patail does not have discretion to charge an offender under the wrong law.’ Just like in the Altuntaya Shaariibuu case, 'motive' was not important to convict here. The consenting partner was not charged. Saiful carried KY Jelly with him. It takes two hands to clap and so in this case both should be charged. Herein lies the public perception of unfairness to Anwar AG, we fully understand what you are saying. You cannot prove 377C so you take the easy way and slap Anwar with 377B. To me, this action speaks volumes and confirms to all that this is political persecution.Suppose I have been having carnal intercourse with my husband all these years, and then one day I have an acrimonious fallout with him and very much want him in jail. I report to the police or to Najib in Shafee Abdullah presence .
Abdul Gani, in my opinion you chose to charge Anwar under Section 337B and not 337C simply because you knew you have zero grounds to charge Anwar under Section 337C as there is no evidence (created or real) to help Saiful to paint the picture that he is an unwilling partner in this sodomy charge. Period.
Attorney-general (AG) Abdul Gani Patail’s deliberate misinterpretation of Section 377B in order to cover up his dereliction of duty to also charge Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan with sodomy must be condemned.
Let me quote Section 377B of the Penal Code: “Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be punished...”. Is it not crystal clear that this section is designed to punish specifically those who have committed the act voluntarily?
Since Saiful was adamant that he was sodomised without his consent, which essentially means that he was raped, why wasn’t Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim charged under Section 377C which was meant for such cases?
Gani claims that he has discretion to charge Anwar under either Section 377B or 377C, but the truth is that he hasn’t.
He only has the discretion under Article 145(3) of the federal constitution to either charge or not to charge for an offence, but he certainly does not have the discretion to charge an offender under the wrong law.
Actually, the AG had three options at the outset of the case:
a) Charge both Anwar and Saiful under Section 377B.
b) Charge Anwar under Section 377C.
c) Not to charge Anwar.
And at the finality of the case now, the AG is left with only one option, and that is: charge Saiful under Section 377B.
He is bound to do so, as Anwar has already been convicted under Section 377B by the Federal Court, meaning that sodomy was committed by the two parties - voluntarily.
As the country’s political landscape undergoes a massive transformation, Najib Rogue regime is expediting the nailing of their ‘coffin’. Najib ’s stock has hit rock bottom after For this reason, I think even the conservatives will realise this unpalatable reality, given time and persuasion to chew over the fatal consequences of so decisively alienating such large and important…
Attorney-general (AG) Abdul Gani Patail’s deliberate misinterpretation of Section 377B in order to cover up his dereliction of duty to also charge Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan with sodomy must be condemned.
Let me quote Section 377B of the Penal Code: “Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be punished...”. Is it not crystal clear that this section is designed to punish specifically those who have committed the act voluntarily?
Since Saiful was adamant that he was sodomised without his consent, which essentially means that he was raped, why wasn’t Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim charged under Section 377C which was meant for such cases?
Gani claims that he has discretion to charge Anwar under either Section 377B or 377C, but the truth is that he hasn’t.
He only has the discretion under Article 145(3) of the federal constitution to either charge or not to charge for an offence, but he certainly does not have the discretion to charge an offender under the wrong law.
Actually, the AG had three options at the outset of the case:
a) Charge both Anwar and Saiful under Section 377B.
b) Charge Anwar under Section 377C.
c) Not to charge Anwar.
And at the finality of the case now, the AG is left with only one option, and that is: charge Saiful under Section 377B.
He is bound to do so, as Anwar has already been convicted under Section 377B by the Federal Court, meaning that sodomy was committed by the two parties - voluntarily.
As the country’s political landscape undergoes a massive transformation, Najib Rogue regime is expediting the nailing of their ‘coffin’. Najib ’s stock has hit rock bottom after For this reason, I think even the conservatives will realise this unpalatable reality, given time and persuasion to chew over the fatal consequences of so decisively alienating such large and important…
Yes, says Shafee Abdullah. But even he admits Malaysians don’t see it that way.readmoreCan the federal court judges, Malaysian judiciary prove that it is independent and had integrity?.
Cops seize Zunar's book on Rosmah before launch
If the probe report turns the needle of suspicion towards Rosmah it is more towards the integrity of the country’s PM Najib we need thorough investigation, including into the changeable findings of Sometimes you do not realise you are in the midst of a vast silence till it is pierced through with sound. Often, you may…
No comments:
Post a Comment