Monday, March 14, 2011

Solicitor-General II Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden said Judge has no Discretion to Exclude Evidence in US Worse Court Decisions



this is the work of KARMA

He had a long time to reflect on his life and judgments whilst bed-ridden, Who says that there is no justice in this world? He wanted to sit in the highest court in the land,which he did but died on the lowly bed. Hope when he meets the ultimate judge, he will be able to justify all he did. He can be assured that he will get a fair hearing there.
Having make judgments on top, Now he face the underworld judgement against him, for all I can care, I hope those underground people will torture and and give him hard times.
IGP Musa Hassan, with all the relevations about you , you must be trembling night and day. I know you are hardened against fellow human beings but you cannot run away from and be against GOD.



Solicitor-General II Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden claimed that judge Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah should not be concerned with how evidence samples in the trial were obtained “as long as it is relevant, it is admissible.”
“Judge has no discretion to exclude evidence even if obtained illegally. Your lordship cannot exclude it just because it was obtained via unfair means, except in cases of confession.
“Court should not be concerned with how it is obtained, as long as it is relevant, it is admissible,” he said.
Anwar’s defence lawyers recently won a ruling in which all evidence retrieved from the lock-up during the period — a towel, toothbrush and mineral water bottle as well all DNA samples relating to the items — was expunged.
The prosecution has however asked the court to review that ruling, resulting in two submissions by Yusof today — one demanding a review of the ruling, and another urging the court to compel Anwar to provide his DNA samples for reference to those found in complainant Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan’s anus.
Yusof said that while Mohd Zabidin could not ask Anwar to surrender his DNA samples, the judge could order someone else to obtain them from him.
What was relevant, according to Yusof, was whether the DNA obtained from Saiful’s anus could be matched to the accused (Anwar).
“The chief function of a judge is to see that justice is done between parties, and a too rigid adherence to set rules may sometimes embarrass the judge in the performance of his duties and defeat the ends of justice,” said Yusof.
The lead prosecutor insisted that Anwar’s arrest on July 15, 2008 was legal, saying that he was informed of the grounds of arrest.
Yusof also produced the arrest warrant in court which went missing during the trial-within-a-trial.
“The warrant of arrest was served and acknowledged by Anwar.
“In the trial-within-a-trial, Anwar did not deny or challenge that he was informed by the IO (DSP Jude Pereira). Neither did he deny it was served to him,” argued Yusof who stressed that the three exhibits should be tendered in as evidence.
The defence team will be presenting its submission-in-reply tomorrow morning.
Government scientist Dr Seah Lay Hong testified last month that she had found two unknown male DNA profiles around Saiful’s anus, one of which she had earlier called “Male Y”.
Anwar had refused to provide DNA samples in his first sodomy trial in 1998 for fear they could be manipulated.
Former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim also claimed last January that DNA evidence was fabricated in Anwar’s first sodomy trial.
The DNA Identification Act 2008 was passed to compel suspects to provide DNA samples, despite protests from Pakatan Rakyat (PR) lawmakers.
Anwar, the 63-year-old PKR de facto leader, is currently facing sodomy charges for the second time in his life.
He has denied the charge, describing it as “evil, frivolous lies by those in power” when the charge was read out to him. He is charged under section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years’ jail and whipping upon conviction.
The trial is taking place 18 months after Anwar was charged in court in August 2008.
He was charged with sodomy and corruption in 1998 after he was sacked from the Cabinet and was later convicted and jailed for both offences.
He was freed in September 2004 and later resurrected his political career by winning back his Permatang Pauh parliamentary seat in a by-election in 2008, which had been held in the interim by his wife.
He led the loose pact of PKR, DAP and PAS to a historic sweep of five states and 82 parliamentary seats in Election 2008.



This man was a "judge" of man, some kind of judge? Now he faces GOD, THE CREATOR, THE GREATEST EQUALISER, THE ALMIGHTY and THE SUPREME DIVINE JUDGE OF ALL MEN AND THE UNIVERSE, who will consider his "credentials" (if any) irrelevant! What is relevant is how he judged others. Did he uphold his oath of office with impartiality, PURE CONSCIENCE, prudence and good faith? Only God knows.









Prosecution: Judge cannot exclude Anwar's personal items as evidence

The High Court has no power to exclude evidence from Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy trial just because it was obtained through “unfair means”, prosecutors argued today.
Solicitor-General II Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden claimed that judge Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah should not be concerned with how evidence samples in the trial were obtained “as long as it is relevant, it is admissible.”
“Judge has no discretion to exclude evidence even if obtained illegally. Your lordship cannot exclude it just because it was obtained via unfair means, except in cases of confession.
“Court should not be concerned with how it is obtained, as long as it is relevant, it is admissible,” he said.
Anwar’s defence lawyers recently won a ruling in which all evidence retrieved from the lock-up during the period — a towel, toothbrush and mineral water bottle as well all DNA samples relating to the items — was expunged.
The prosecution has however asked the court to review that ruling, resulting in two submissions by Yusof today — one demanding a review of the ruling, and another urging the court to compel Anwar to provide his DNA samples for reference to those found in complainant Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan’s anus.
Yusof said that while Mohd Zabidin could not ask Anwar to surrender his DNA samples, the judge could order someone else to obtain them from him.
What was relevant, according to Yusof, was whether the DNA obtained from Saiful’s anus could be matched to the accused (Anwar).
“The chief function of a judge is to see that justice is done between parties, and a too rigid adherence to set rules may sometimes embarrass the judge in the performance of his duties and defeat the ends of justice,” said Yusof.
The lead prosecutor insisted that Anwar’s arrest on July 15, 2008 was legal, saying that he was informed of the grounds of arrest.
Yusof also produced the arrest warrant in court which went missing during the trial-within-a-trial.
“The warrant of arrest was served and acknowledged by Anwar.
“In the trial-within-a-trial, Anwar did not deny or challenge that he was informed by the IO (DSP Jude Pereira). Neither did he deny it was served to him,” argued Yusof who stressed that the three exhibits should be tendered in as evidence.
The defence team will be presenting its submission-in-reply tomorrow morning.
Government scientist Dr Seah Lay Hong testified last month that she had found two unknown male DNA profiles around Saiful’s anus, one of which she had earlier called “Male Y”.
Anwar had refused to provide DNA samples in his first sodomy trial in 1998 for fear they could be manipulated.
Former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim also claimed last January that DNA evidence was fabricated in Anwar’s first sodomy trial.
The DNA Identification Act 2008 was passed to compel suspects to provide DNA samples, despite protests from Pakatan Rakyat (PR) lawmakers.
Anwar, the 63-year-old PKR de facto leader, is currently facing sodomy charges for the second time in his life.
He has denied the charge, describing it as “evil, frivolous lies by those in power” when the charge was read out to him. He is charged under section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years’ jail and whipping upon conviction.
The trial is taking place 18 months after Anwar was charged in court in August 2008.

Augustine Paul THE HELL FIRE WILL EAT DAILY YOUR WARIS WILL BE SELLING THEIR ASSHOLE FOR LIVING THIS IS THE CURSE OF GOOD PEOPLE OF MALAYSI

HELL FIRE WILL EAT YOUTry your best to rest with fires burning around you... difficult heh?
Disgusting Paul has gone to be judged by his Maker. He committed great injustice to the many innocent who bore the consequences of his judgement. He shamed everyone who knew him, his profession and the country...he will be one loss many will rejoice to lose!Good riddance to a corrupt Judge.

Sad to say, but I join the members here in saying.... No Takziah from me.




S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

S. Augustine Paul
S. Augustine Paul
S. Augustine Paul a/l Sinnappen, currently Federal Court judge, subjected himself to be a politicalwhore in 1998. While a Kuala Lumpur high court judge, he participated in the political conspiracy orchestrated by the then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad to bring down the then deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim. He put through a show trial of Anwar and subsequently convicted the latter of sodomy and corruption.
The conviction was clearly riddled with holes. Augustine Paul allowed the prosecution had to change the date of the alleged offence several times after Anwar’s lawyers demonstrated conclusively that he could not have been at the place at the date nominated. So crude was the frame-up that in one case the building in which the offence was alleged to have occurred, had not even been constructed.
augustine_paulIn the end, Augustine Paul took the extraordinary step of allowing the prosecution to nominate 7.45 p.m. somewhere between January and March 1993. Even though the defence produced documents to account for Anwar’s movements for every day over that period, Augustine Paul ignored the evidence and found Anwar guilty.
By convicting Anwar, Augustine Paul solely relied on the framed up allegations of the witness, Azizan Abu Bakar, who was shown by the defence team to beunreliable.
Augustine Paul was infamously called the “irrelevant judge” for repeatedly refusing submissions of evidence by Anwar’s defence team and ruled them ‘irrelevant’.
augustineObviously a judicial officer without anyproper talent noteworthy, he had been a sessions court judge, until one week before Anwar’s sodomy trial. He was promoted promptly to be a high court judge and took on the case. After serving his part in the political conspiracy, he was summarily promoted to be a judge of Court of Appeal on 1 August 2003, and then on to be a judge of Federal Court, the apex court in Malaysia, on 17 June 2005.
He ruled on Apr 16, 2009 that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk ZambryAbd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly. It is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.
The judges of the Federal Court have failed the people and the government of this country when they chose to ignore the law of the Constitution of Malaysia. In other words the judges have refused to do justice according to law.
Incidentally, ultra vires does not mean “outside the law”. It means “outside one’s jurisdiction, beyond the scope of one s power or authority”. And we may ask, who is the Federal Court to say what is beyond the jurisdiction of the Speaker when the supreme law of the country says that “the validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.
He was born October 12, 1944 in Batu Gajah, Perak. He had his early education at Sultan Yusof School, Batu Gajah and Anderson School, Ipoh. He was called to the Bar of Inner Temple, London in 1971 and obtained his Bachelor of Laws Degree from the University of London as an external student in 1979. He is married to Dr Mary with two children, Dr Juliana Sharmini and Alan John.

“An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so.”
Mohandas Gandhi

S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

S. Augustine PaulS. Augustine Paul
S. Augustine Paul a/l Sinnappen, currently Federal Court judge, subjected himself to be a political whore in 1998. While a Kuala Lumpur high court judge, he participated in the political conspiracy orchestrated by the then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad to bring down the then deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim. He put through a show trial of Anwar and subsequently convicted the latter of sodomy and corruption.
The conviction was clearly riddled with holes. Augustine Paul allowed the prosecution had to change the date of the alleged offence several times after Anwar’s lawyers demonstrated conclusively that he could not have been at the place at the date nominated. So crude was the frame-up that in one case the building in which the offence was alleged to have occurred, had not even been constructed.


related articleThe malaysian governtment did the unthinkable, Augustine PauL Federal Court judge GOT THIS POSITION TRU corruption



"There should be a full stop to delays. That type of environment will be created through the Judicial Standards & Accountability Bill. Judicial independence will be sustained and at the same time highest standards of accountability will be fastened," Moily told TOI.

Apart from making the voluntary asset declaration by judges, as per the apex judiciary's resolution of May 7, 1997 a statutory requirement, the bill gives a wider meaning to assets and liabilities.

In fact I am one of the best writer of Eulogies in my area of domicile. But for this mangostene judge, I only have this to say..

He was the most irrelevant judge ever in the history of Moolayuland. Goodbye.

And if you are lonely in the next world, please bring along all your friends with you. Together with Rahmat the bulldogface, you will then enjoy your ill gotten weath in the next world. Although I heard bringing your wealth to the next world is a hard thing to do. he he he he he he he

good ridddance


Mahatahi a/l Kutty must be very glad that one of his ex-slave dog is helping to bury his dirty secrets together with it !

There is a proverb: Man dies yet lives. Let the God take care of the rest.

"Everything that has a begining, has an end"...

We don't have eternal life... And thus it counts how we lived this one... Doing good, the life is worthwhile... And one will die a happy, contented man...

In contrast... Doing evil... U'll suffer your own conscience haunting you... And your action will follow you to your death, showing you like a repeated TV series, over and over again... Until you exhale your last breath...


So... His end has came... And it will take him to where he deserves to be... Judging on what he has done...

May he realize his mistake and repent upon his death... And thereafter, he will be JUDGED, punished well, and then sent down to make good of the evils he has done... As an assignment to contra his mistakes...

how many of u think n believe that his bloody racist master ,the old lizard mahatahi would mourn for this dog by the name augusting paul?
It's a shame that he did not come clean on his death bed. He will now forever be remembered for the wrong he did. No redemption I'm afraid.
Augustine Paul - RIHfE ...Rest in Hell for Eternity.. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 


Idealist, Realist or The Untouchable
IDEALIST, REALIST OR THE UNTOUCHABLETHERE ARE THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRINCIPLE THAT TO LIVE IS EVERYTHING AND BY THIS THEY BELIEVE THAT WE ARE ALL HERE TO SURVIVE AND IN ORDER TO SURVIVE WE JUST HAVE TO BE PRACTICAL (REALISM). ON THE OTHER HAND THERE ARE OTHERS WHO SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRINCIPLE THAT A LIFE WITHOUT IDEALISM IS DEVOID OF GREATNESS THUS SUCH EXISTENCE MEANS LITTLE. BOTH ARE ACCEPTABLE PRINCIPLES DEPENDING ON THE TINT OF THE GLASS THROUGH WHICH WE

MOHD EUSOFF CHIN

Eusoff Chin
MOHD EUSOFF CHIN
MOHD EUSOFF CHIN, CHIEF JUSTICE OF MALAYSIA FROM 1994 – 2000, SUBJECTED HIMSELF TO THE WORST KIND OF CORRUPTION, BY ‘TAGGING’ ALONG LAWYER V.K. LINGAM ON A FAMILY VACATION IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1994. HE SUBSEQUENTLY LIED TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON THE LINGAM TAPE SCANDAL.
THE SCANDAL OF EUSOFF CHIN WAS EXPOSED AS FAR BACK AS 1998 WHEN MALAYSIAKINI FIRST CARRIED THE INVESTIGATION REPORTS BY PRIVATE EYE BOWMAN INVESTIGATIONS. IN 2008, THE SHAME OF EUSOFF CHIN WAS BROUGHT BACK TO LIGHT WITH MORE DETAILS ALONG THE INVESTIGATION OF THE LINGAM TAPE SCANDAL.
IN THE LINGAM TAPE SCANDAL, HIS NAME WAS AGAIN MENTIONED IN THE TAPED CONVERSATION SUGGESTING MORE IMPROPER MEDDLING ON HIS PART IN THE FUNCTIONING OF THE JUDICIARY.A UK-BASED PRIVATE INVESTIGATION AGENCY HAS RAISED A NUMBER OF FRESH ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE NEW ZEALAND HOLIDAY OF CHIEF JUSTICE EUSOFF CHIN AND PROMINENT LAWYER VK LINGAM IN 1994. READMOREPRIVATE INVESTIGATION AGENCY’S PROBE INTO POSSIBLE MISCONDUCT BY CHIEF JUSTICE EUSOFF CHIN, LAWYER V.K. LINGAM AND BUSINESS TYCOON VINCENT TAN

WHAT FINDINGS DO YOU WANT TO CHALLENGE, YOU BUNCH OF CORRUPTED BASTARDS!



This man was a "judge" of man, some kind of judge? Now he faces GOD, THE CREATOR, THE GREATEST EQUALISER, THE ALMIGHTY and THE SUPREME DIVINE JUDGE OF ALL MEN AND THE UNIVERSE, who will consider his "credentials" (if any) irrelevant! What is relevant is how he judged others. Did he uphold his oath of office with impartiality, PURE CONSCIENCE, prudence and good faith? Only God knows.


jeffooi02-1.jpg (372×505)


POOR people is below the law, RICH UMNO above it
If you were to drink and drive on New Year’s eve – or on any other day, for that matter – (not that you’re silly enough to drink and drive, of course) and were stopped by a cop, you’d likely face a stiff fine up to Rs 5,000 and a possible night in jail. Compare this with the case of former chief minister sexually molested and raped her a 14-year-old girl,. Her family was persecuted by members of the umno police; herfriens had 11 false cases made against them, and the family eventually had to leave the state. Almost 20 years later, the perpetrator of this crime gets a chairman of felcra




The reason given for this gross travesty of justice is that the An uproar has been created in the media and in Parliament by the but lim guan eng has to go jail case. But like so many other cause celebres will this too prove to be a nine-day-horror, soon wiped out from public memory by a more topical scandal, a more recent and more gory crime?READ MORE POOR people is below the law, RICH UMNO above THE ASSHOLES ARE DANCINGWITH DACING it
Bad karma leads to pain and suffering as a way of cleansing and attonement. That he was bed-ridden is no surprise. That he died at such a relatively young age is no surprise. Is UMNO/BN able to help him? I wonder!

[Crew_Toilets_-_Shinkoku_Maru.jpg]
Can a thief plead as defence that so

God will deal with each and everyone of us in his own time and in his own way! But AP has had his chance? Did he use it wisely? I supposed it is irrelevant now. May God help him for all the evil he did and the harmhe did to Anwar Ibrahim.

his name will stink for ten thousand years !!!

Pity for his children and grand children, they have to bear the eternal shame due to his most despicable, most vile injustice and cruelty he did to Anwar .
He is dead ang God will decide what to do with him

Anyway to me he is IRRELEVAT to the Judicial fraternity.

Bye Bye Mangosteen Paul


dear UMNO,

augustine paul has helped you to defeat your opponents.......but has your ALLAH the great helped him by extending his lifespan here?????????.................he has died in vain helping you!!!!........this is the LAW of KARMA!!!!!......not even your ALLAH could prevent it!!!!

if you dont understand.......tiew niamah UMNO!

undisclosed ailment.....

act of God...........Najis and the fat pig soon......PM's plane cRASH
God will judge him as he judged others.

I never thought I would write this but may this monster rot for eternity in the deepest 17th level of Hell and never to be reborn!

A happy new year to you, Motherchell.....pls add more salt to it...i wouldn't mind!!!

"has died today of an undisclosed ailment."...ha ha ha...come on, cut him up to pieces and do a few autopsy on this piece of "irrelevant" judge......maybe he died of "pecah perut"....the Tok
Do you think it's a call for celebration? One less kangaroo to make stupid judgment!! Yipeeyayeh!!

At 64, how much did he manage to accumulate and how much joy did he derive from his ill gotten gains??

Najis is a curse to all evil kronies of UMNo. Dropping one by one like dead flies. This is definitely a good beginning for a exciting new year!
I can 't believe I wrote this on 25th December in the comments section of another article.-

How come not much details about this scum of a judge? Augustine Paul. How come he is allowed to get a way with what he has done. Was his life threatened? Were his children's lives in danger? Was he black mailed? extorted? If the answer is NO, then Augustine Paul, you have been exposed for what you are - a scumbag. You will go down in Malaysian History as the most unprincipled and corrupt judge ever ton sit on the bench. Don't think you can quietly slink away into your burrow to enjoy all the illgotten gains because you will one day have to face justice. Is there anyone sick in your family? is there turmoil in relationships in your family? Is there trouble in your family? Can you sleep peacefully at night? Beware, all these are a warning to you. The blood of inoncents are on your hands. 
Well said folks ! Well said !

strom62 may i add in all the alphabets of the animals reared by the Mahathief to cover Gods roll call??Thanks Mate!

From the musang to the killers out in The-not-so- peaceful -Hill to the plains of Putrajaya. Its a perfect 10 scored by the Almighty!

Its New Year alright for a Free Malaysia!!

Let us hope that his soul will rest in peace, whatever the past. We MT readers and bloggers are good and decent people and wish him well in the Kingdom of God.

this is the work of KARMA!!!!!

He had a long time to reflect on his life and judgments whilst bed-ridden, Who says that there is no justice in this world? He wanted to sit in the highest court in the land,which he did but died on the lowly bed. Hope when he meets the ultimate judge, he will be able to justify all he did. He can be assured that he will get a fair hearing there.
Having make judgments on top, Now he face the underworld judgement against him, for all I can care, I hope those underground people will torture and and give him hard times.
IGP Musa Hassan, with all the relevations about you , you must be trembling night and day. I know you are hardened against fellow human beings but you cannot run away from and be against GOD.


He is dead and my last piece ....

He is dying not one dead but thousands of death. This is just the first! Enjoy dying Paul because you cannot live like a living. You make living difficult for the righteous and GOD is teaching you to die a thousand dead in HELL.

Many will join you. Your cahoots and friends you have.

HALL OF SHAME

Eusoff Chin
Mohd Eusoff Chin
DISGRACE#01 Mohd Eusoff Chin, Chief Justice of Malaysia from 1994 – 2000, subjected himself to the worst kind of corruption, by ‘tagging’ along lawyer V.K. Lingam on a family vacation in New Zealand in 1994. He subsequently lied to the Royal Commission of Inquiry on the Lingam tape scandal.
S. Augustine Paul
S. Augustine Paul
DISGRACE#02 S. Augustine Paul, currently Federal Court judge, subjected himself to be a political whore when in 1998, while being a Kuala Lumpur high court judge, participated in the political conspiracy orchestrated by then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. He put through a show trial of then-deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim and subsequently convicted the latter of sodomy and corruption. Among his notorieties, he allowed the prosecution to change the time of offence three times when Anwar’s lawyers provided the alibi.
Ahmad Fairuz bin Sheikh Abdul Halim
Ahmad Fairuz bin Sheikh Abdul Halim
DISGRACE#03 Ahmad Fairuz bin Sheikh Abdul Halim, Chief Justice of Malaysia from 2003 to 2007, was taped in the ‘judicial fixing’ scandal where he was heard in conversation with lawyer V.K. Lingam, on how to get Fairuz to be elevated as chief justice of Malaysia. He subsequently lied to the Royal Commission of Inquiry that he was not the other party in the said telephone conversation.
ridwan
Ridwan bin Ibrahim
DISGRACE#04 Ridwan bin Ibrahim, currently judicial commissioner of Ipoh high court, participated in the aftermath of Perak state coup by Najib Tun Razak. He first created the stir when he infamously ruled that five lawyers appointed by Perak State Speaker V. Sivakumar had no locus standi to represent Sivakumar. The astonishing ruling forced Sivakumar to be unrepresented effectively, as his ruling also stated that Sivakumar can only be represented by the state legal advisor, who has been shown to be colluding with the illegal menteri besar Zambry.
Ramly bin Hj Ali
Ramly bin Hj Ali
DISGRACE#05 Ramly bin Hj Ali, currently a judge at the Court of Appeal, took side on the Perak MB vs. MB on May 12, 2009 when he alone heard the appeal from BN menteri besar Zambry and granted him stay of execution on the High Court ruling, which declared Nizar as the legitimate menteri besar. Ramly’s hearing the appeal alone was a serious departure from the norm of the Court of Appeal, which hears cases in panel of at least three judges.
Balia Yusof bin Haji Wahi
Balia Yusof bin Haji Wahi
DISGRACE#06 Balia Yusof bin Haji Wahi, currently a judge at Kuala Lumpur high court, dismissed on Apr 1, 2009, Perak state assembly speaker V. Sivakumar’s application to strike out summons by brought by the three independent assemblymen, seeking a declaration that Sivakumar’s order to declare their assembly seats vacant was illegal.
Balia Yusof’s decision is a stark violation of the very fundamental of separations of powers, where proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State cannot be intervened by the court.
Alauddin bin Mohd. Sheriff
Alauddin bin Mohd. Sheriff
DISGRACE#07 Alauddin bin Mohd. Sheriff, currently president of the Court of Appeal, ruled on Apr 16, 2009 that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly. It is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.
Arifin bin Zakaria
Arifin bin Zakaria
DISGRACE#08 Arifin bin Zakaria, currently Chief Judge of Malaya, ruled on Apr 16, 2009 that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly. It is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.
Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin
Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin
DISGRACE#09 Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin, currently Federal Court judge, ruled on Apr 16, 2009 that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly. It is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.
Nik Hashim Nik Ab. Rahman
Nik Hashim Nik Ab. Rahman
DISGRACE#10 Nik Hashim Nik Ab. Rahman, former Federal Court judge, ruled on Apr 16, 2009 that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly. It is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.
Mohd Zaki bin Md. Yasin
Mohd Zaki bin Md. Yasin


joy to the world n human civilisation indeed!!!
mohd. rahmat,the bloody racist n umno liar poisonous propaganda master-mind ,the dog judge paul augustine,present from allah to malaysian for 2010 to begin with indeed!!
better still if we can hav goons , thieves n robbers like the indon thief k.toyol,100 billion squanderer bloody racist mahatahi,musang hassan the biggest crook,patahi another pariah ,mudyielding the scandalous MB,ahmad ismail the mad cow,sambri the MB tipu,najis the crime minister , the fcuked up kaki polek rais yatim,the white hair devil of sarawak tahi mudmud plus all the umno devils on the list!!!!
Seldom should humans rejoice in the death of a fellow human-being, but the departure of this rascal of an Injustice is one of the many exceptions whose death has long been wished for and awaited.

All of us come with nothing and we go with nothing. No one is special or different. It is the deeds done in between the coming and going that make the difference. Corruption, power and ruthlessness are liabilities.

Now, Augustine Paul, an undignified shady character of a crooked judge! -- you are now to report the whole truth on Mahathir and the other living bastards to your Maker as mitigating circumstances to lessen your fiery punishment. Take them along with you on the double! Do this one bit and, maybe, the King of Hell wouldn't judge your soul IRRELEVANT.

A good start to 2010. May the many traitors to Malaysia go to HELL one after another!!
I am sorry I have nothing nice to say about him even in death. Less one mercenary for UMNO and less one to distort justice in Malaysia. No doubt there will be others willing to take his place for money and position.
Rahmat 01-01-10, Paul 02-01-10, next please

Rahmat
Augustine Paul
Hishamudin
Mahathir
Ahmad Ismail
Toyol



All of us has to walk this path no matter who you are. We do not want to comment more than necessary at this moment of sadness for the family. Just one question: Is it worth it???

Me too I will ask "Is it worth it?" Hs children and their children's children will have to bear the slur. He died without asking for forgiveness from a man who has not done him any wrong, but who had to suffer so much injustice from a wicked judge.
IS IT WORTH IT??
A MAN IS JUDGED BY HIS DEED.EVEN THE MAKER JUDGE A MAN BY HIS DEED.IF A MAN ROLL IN SIN (KILL THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN MALAYSIA) FOR 63 YEARS 364 DAYS AND ON THE THE LAST DAY OF HIS LIFE TO MAKE AMEN WITH THE MAKER IS STUPID FOR THE MAKER TO KEEP HIM IN HEAVEN. HAVE SYAING THAT, MAYBE THAT IS WHY JESUS DIE FOR OTHERS SIN?/
I don't expect to read kind comments on the death of a rotten judge. It was bad enough for Mahashithead, with the help of the AG and Musang, to cook up a sodomy charge on Anwar. It was worse for a judge to take part in the scandal and painted our national history black. his death is one more step to good governance.
All of us has to walk this path no matter who you are. We do not want to comment more than necessary at this moment of sadness for the family. Just one question: Is it worth it???
My deepest condolence to his family although his professional quality as a judge is very much questionable.
No sympathy for this "irrelavant" judge!

May he rot in hell. . .!


no doubt many have cursed him before

but when a man goes one hope that god will b kind to him
WE all have to meet our maker one day. I just hope the judge has made amends. At 64, what a young age.

No comments:

Post a Comment