Friday, March 18, 2011

Saiful BukharI Thank God I'm a Bisexual UMMI is my Best Partner in Sex


Saiful BukharI Thank God I'm a Bisexual UMMI is my Best Partner in Sex



FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 2011

Saiful BukharI Thank God I'm a Bisexual UMMI is my Best Partner in Sex








We can't tell you how happy we are to bring you the third installment of Sassy Gay Friend just this month. Sure, our heroine-saving hero with a penchant for scarves is coming to us at a price -- product placement -- but at least we're getting to see more than just the occasional episode.
Last week's "Black Swan" episode was a hit, but this week S.G.F. gets back to his roots and helps out one of Shakespeare's ladies: Lady Macbeth.
"First of all, stop getting your political news from crazy old women who live in the bushes," isn't even the snappiest line in this rescue session, where S.G.F. convinces Lady Macbeth not to act like a crazed control freak. Watch the video below and check Sassy Gay Friend's spiffy new website and his Facebookfor more sassy gay goodness.
WATCH:



gay and bisexual men's preferences about the characteristics of a future rectal microbicide for anal intercourse




Melissa Rader, MPH
1, Gary Marks, PhD1, Gordon Mansergh, PhD1, Nicole Crepaz, PhD1, Sheila Murphy, PhD2, Lynn Miller, PhD2, and Paul Robert Appleby, PhD2. (1) Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention - Epidemiology Branch, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E45, Atlanta, GA 30342, 404-639-6174, mvr6@cdc.gov, (2) University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
OBJECTIVE – To provide a multidimensional examination of men who have sex with men’s (MSM) preferences about the characteristics of a potential microbicide for anal intercourse. METHODS – 387 MSM were recruited at street locations in West Hollywood, California. Participants rated 48 features that might characterize a microbicide product, indicating the extent to which each feature increased or decreased the likelihood of product use (7-point scale) and selecting the feature most important to them. Seven dimensions were formed: product effectiveness, use of product, convenience/accessibility, physical attributes of product, physical effects of its use, psychological effects, and interpersonal concerns. RESULTS – Sample characteristics: 52% white, 22% African-American, and 26% Latino. 72% reported they were HIV-negative; 15% were HIV-positive and 13% had unknown HIV serostatus. Median age was 29. The dimension “effectiveness of the product” had the highest composite mean rating (6.51). 40% of the participants indicated that confidence in effectiveness against HIV infection was the feature most important to them. Participants also wanted the product to be effective against other sexually transmitted diseases, to be recommended by an expert, to not reduce physical sensation or pleasure, and to allow for personal control. Preferences were similar across age, ethnicity, education, income, and HIV serostatus. CONCLUSION – These findings can help guide future development and marketing of a microbicide for MSM. The fact that preferences were similar across sociodemographic characteristics suggests that HIV prevention campaigns to promote information and use of a microbicide may be able to target a wide audience of MSM.
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the session, the participant will be able to: 1)List five features MSM consider important to them in a future rectal microbicide, 2)Discuss the relationship of sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes, and behavior with microbicide feature preferences, 3)Describe the implications these findings have for future development, marketing and prevention efforts
Keywords: Gay Men, HIV/AIDS
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: None
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

GAMBAR FARAH AZLINA


Farah Azlina Abdul Latif yang terbabit dalam kes liwat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim telah digugurkan dari pasukan pendakwaan kes itu berkuatkuasa serta merta kerana didakwa ada hubungan 'Cinta' bersama Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

SAIFUL AKAN 'BERKAHWIN' DENGAN FARAH AZLINA?


Oleh Dzulkarnain Taib


Suara Keadilan | SHAH ALAM 28 Julai - Setelah digugurkan daripada pasukan pendakwaan yang mengendalikan kes liwat Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, desas desus timbul Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Farah Azlina Latif dikatakan akan berkahwin saksi utama pihak pendakwaan, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan dalam masa terdekat.

Menurut sumber badan kehakiman yang memberitahu Suara Keadilan, Saiful dan Farah dikatakan bercadang melangsungkan perkahwinan mereka secepat mungkin bagi menggelakkan lebih banyak persepsi buruk masyarakat terhadap mereka.

Hubungan romantik antara mereka terbongkar apabila penulis blog terkenal, Raja Petra Kamarudin mendedahkan dalam portal berita beliau, MalaysiaToday mengenai hubungan sulit Saiful dengan seorang timbalan pendakwaraya wanita.

Bagaimana pun hubungan cinta yang dirahsiakan itu mendapat kritikan hebat daripada pengamal undang-undang yang melihat pegawai Pejabat Peguam Negara itu telah meletakkan perjalanan pendakwaan terhadap Anwar dalam keadaan yang meragukan.

Ini kerana maklumat kertas siasatan pihak pendakwaan berkemungkinan mampu dibocorkan kepada Saiful yang mempuunyai kepentingan dalam kes tersebut sebagai pengadu.

Menurut laman web Pejabat Peguam Negara, Farah Azlina merupakan Timbalan Pendakwa Raya pada Gred L44.

Sebelum ditukar sebagai Timbalan Pendakwa Raya di Bahagian Pendakwaan pada 16 Februari 2010 lalu, Farah Azlina yang dipercayai berusia awal 30an bertugas di Bahagian Perbicaraan dan Rayuan dalam jawatan yang sama.

Dalam sidang media yang diadakan semalam, Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail berkata Farah Azlina juga digugurkan daripada Bahagian Pendakwaan, kurang enam bulan pertukaran beliau, atas alasan mengadakan hubungan romantis dengan Saiful.

Bagaimanapun Abdul Gani tidak menyatakan apakah status Farah Azlina di Pejabat Peguam Negara setelah beliau digugurkan.

Sebelum hubungan dengan Timbalan Pendakwa Raya ini, Saiful dikatakan mengikat tali pertunangan dengan Janna Syariza Mohd Zaki.
These 2 characteristics have been PROVEN by science to be more common in Gay men!
76% of men who have these 2 TRAITS are GAY!
If you have a counter-clockwise cowlick or whorl in your hair you are more likely to be gay!
76% of men who have these 2 TRAITS are GAY!
If your index finger is longer than your ring finger, then you are more likely to be gay!
If you have BOTH of these characteristics, there is a 76% chance you are gay. Did modern science guess correctly?


There is one brain part, called the anterior commisure, that's bigger in gay men's brains than in those of heterosexual males. Most of my thoughts here are about looking at what that might mean, and how it might appear. (Reference)
So, what's it do?
It connects two structures together. The amygdala on each side of the brain.
So, what does the amygdala do?
Its a very, very emotional structure. And it's fast. If you suddenly notice a bus heading toward you, and you feel a 'burst' of fear, that's your amygdala; the one on the right. If you feel a burst of elation when someone looks at you with attraction in their eyes, that's your amygdala, too; the one on the left.
A gay man's brain has more connections between the opposite emotional centers than other brains.
The amygdala does an important kind of recognition, too. It recognizes other people, or more importantly, how they're feeling. It responds to facial expressions, tones of voice, and, I'd guess, body language as well.
My guess is that its important in seeing potential mates, and so, its the part that knows who you're attracted to, gay, straight, transsexual, bisexual or whatever.
The gay male brain uses the same parts to be attracted to a man that I use to be attracted to a woman.
I cannot help but wonder if the extra connections might allow extra recognition skills, and a wider sense of what a person's meaning might be. When a male brain selects people of the same gender as the focus for sexual feelings, it gives its owner a set of concerns and needs in common with women. Men become the people they want to be with, forcing them to pay attention to men's needs, and women become the object of identification, at least in some ways. At the same time they ARE men, so they still have to identify there, too. As a straight man, an attractive woman 'means' something very different to me than she does to a gay man. And guess what? The amygdala mediates our experience of 'meaningfulness'.
Such a person would be able to empathize with a very large portion of the total population; larger than heterosexuals of either gender.
Most evolutionary biologists will agree that if a species preserves a trait, its because that trait helps that species survive, or at least did so when it first emerged.
One of the traits of the human species is that close 10 percent (the number changes according to who does the counting) of our populations are gay. If Darwin (and some others) are right, the our species needed gay males when we first appeared, and we might need them now.
What for?
Well, gay men do not compete with straight men for one thing, but they understand many, if not most, uniquely male concerns, because they are men.
And they share enough in common with women that they understand women's concerns, too. Many lesbians are a bit taken aback by how indifferent many gay men are to feminist political concerns, but those aren't the women's concerns I mean. I'm talking about such things as 'cognitive style', 'linguistic patterns' and other things that you need a special dictionary to get.
Gay males might have enhanced their tribe's ability to respond to danger quickly. Their voice in the councils of the first human tribes could have been a profound advantage.
There are two things that help an individual be heard in human cultures. One is to be the boss, and the other is to have as few conflicts with others as possible.
Gay males, being less interested in war than other males, do not conflict with their tribal neighbors.
They do not compete with straight males for sexual opportunities,
And, they do not compete with women over the resources for their young. A hundred thousand years ago, this was probably VERY important. It takes a decade to raise a child, at least. In a ten-year period, most of our young probably had to live through at least one lean season. When it was going on, the gay man only had to find food for one. But he was quite strong and intelligent to find food for several, just like anyone else, if it was to be had at all.
Our species arose 100,000 years ago, and we were hunters and gatherers. Most of these societies today are a loose kind of democracy, and the chiefs don't really have the power to command obedience from anybody. Decisions were and are made in councils. In our earliest history, these decisions were sometimes a matter of life and death. Making sure that our populations produced some individuals who had extra empathetic skills might have given us more intelligent leadership than otherwise. The larger anterior commisure implies that gay males might be more able to perceive meaningfulness, too. "Meaningfulness" is an amygdaloid function - innocuous things become omens, possibly selected because the event taken as the omen has some association with a concern among one's people. (Stimulate your amygdala - learn more here)
One example might be what a storm cloud means when its windy outside. The extra left/right connectivity in gay males would give them a greater sense of the nuances and subtle implications of events in their world. Being men, however, they would have a greater ability to articulate their subtler perceptions, because the male brain is more 'single-tasking' than the female brain; it is more likely to use one or two areas at a time - including the language centers.
Because gay males have more communication between the hemispheres, they percieve non-verbal information (including the sort we call intuitive) more readily then straight males. Because they still possess male brains, their cognitive processes are more focused (less multitasking) than they would be in women, allowing them an advantage in getting non-verbal information into words, where it can be shared with others. An intuition becomes a channeled voice. A dream contains spoken instructions. A gay male, all other conditions being equal, was more able to go from a sense-that-something-is-wrong to seeing and describing a specific danger. They might also be better able to find ways to improve things, be more comfortable, and stay healthy.
Consider the stereotype that gay men are 'esthete' - they are gourmets when eating, film critics when seeing movies, interior designers at home, and fashion and grooming experts in front of mirrors. Nothing but the best. Now, imagine that same trait 100,000 years ago, and add to it the caveat that people acted for their tribe as much as for themselves, there being little one could claim as one's own. Nothing but the best and most sheltered campsite. Nothing but the clearest water. Everyone should be clean and attrective (by whatever standard his nation held) - as much as possible. With their extra emotional sensitivity, they would encourage people to be nice to one another. Further, freedom from many of the usual social obligations - like the need to let others save face - could allow gay males to be more vocal than other males might be. Someone demanding the best for himself in those days would have had to demand the best for the whole tribe.
I know I'm making many generalizations here, and many gay men do not fit the stereotype, but my point is that gay male traits, though held by only a few, can benefit many.
When a gay male had an opinion, a hundred thousand years ago, his people probably listened.
In our earliest evolutionary history, as hunter/gatherers, we were better able to survive our crises, and to avoid them when we could, by having a group with a different set of cognitive skills who tended to avoid the conflicts that were most pressing to everybody else. They probably were important peacemakers in our first cultures. And peace is one thing that we need to survive, and to raise our young.
One study found that women who were pregnant in Berlin at the end of World War Two delivered a slightly higher percentage of gay male children than others. Perhaps the response to war is to try and deliver more peacemakers.
That may be why our gene pool contains instructions for making our populations include 10 percent gay males.
So why should this man, and not that man, be gay?
There is a process that could create this difference. The emergence of a recessive, neotanous trait.
Neotany is the name used when an adult in a species retains a childhood trait. The best-know example is human curiosity. Other primate species are as curious as our children, but it stops with puberty. Our adults are capable of retaining the trait their whole lives.
Brains don't grow uniformly. They grow in steps. First one part grows outstrips the others, then another gets bigger. Then another. Then another.
My guess (speculation) is that there is a phase in the growth of every male brain when the anterior commisure has outstripped its neighboring structures. I also guess that there is a trigger that signals when its time for the anterior commisure to stop growing.
And that, in gay males, this trigger is absent. This kind of adaptation is called "Neoteny"
Some gay men say that they've 'always known' they were gay. Others have said that there was a single decisive sexual experience that brought it out.
Its possible that the anterior commisure has two growth spurts when it might be able to shed its 'stop growing' trigger. One during in the womb, and another after birth, but before puberty. Perhaps there are several such 'windows of opportunity' in the development of a man's brain. There isn't enough evidence at this point to prove or disprove the case. The simplest thing I can imagine is an environmental 'cue' of some sort, either in the womb or in the environment.
One more thing about the anterior commisure. Its in the limbic system, and the limbic system is now the strongest contender as the source, within the brain, of religious and mystic experiences. There are scores of studies to support this, most of them published in medical journals, and are still unknown in spiritual teachings.
Nevertheless, a conclusion appears: Gay men were probably our first spiritual leaders. Our Shamans. In that social position, they would have been free to expect that their words would be heard, they would have been able to exploit their cognitive skills to the maximum, and they would have been able to access many altered states of consciousness that would've been unavailable to others.
The trust and respect that a skilled gay shaman might have been able to command might allow him to induce the placebo effect in other during times of illness, too.
Gay men may once have healed their people, led them spirituality, soothed interpersonal conflicts, and help them anticipate and avoid threats to their survival.
Who knows? Perhaps gay male sexual preference is a by-product of a specific group of cognitive and emotional skills that helped us survive - skills that may be expensive for the individual gay man, but were essential for the population as a whole.
A 100 percent heterosexual population might have gone extinct.
But then, we don't have a 100 percent straight population, do we?


Some lucky paparazzo got the shots of his lifetime, when he happened to stumble upon the heir to the throne, Prince William, taking an outdoor piss during a break from Polo match. I wonder how much millions he got for these photos. One thing is fore sure, some where out there a former paparazzo is driving his new Bentley. Girl, this is not a typical holding pose for us boys. Maybe Royals fingers grab differently or something like a cigar.




DR MAHATHIR MOHAMAD DEDICATED 20 PAGES OF HIS MEMOIRS INTO DETAILING HOW HE CAME TO KNOW ABOUT ANWAR IBRAHIM’S ALLEGED SEXUAL LIAISONS WITH MEN AND WOMEN, LEADING TO THE LATTER’S SACKING IN 1998.ZIONIST BAPTIZED PARAIAN AHMAD ZAHID WILL RATHER SHARE BED WITH UMNO’S PROSTITUTE UMMI HAFILDA ALI THEN BREAK THE WALLS OF MUSLIM DIVISIONUMNO VICE-PRESIDENT AHMAD ZAHID HAMIDI ON SATURDAY VOWED TO DEFEND PARTY PRESIDENT NAJIB ABDUL RAZAK TO HIS LAST BREATH. “IF ANYONE WANTS TO TOPPLE NAJIB, THEY WOULD HAVE TO CROSS OVER THE BODY OF THIS PERSON IN FRONT OF YOU. “WE WILL HAVE TO DEFEND HIM. THE BLOOD THAT FLOWS IN HIS VEINS IS … READ MORE IN THE CHAPTER ‘ANWAR’S CHALLENGE’, MAHATHIR STATES: “FOUR YEARS AFTER IGP TUN HANIF FIRST TOLD ME ABOUT ALLEGATIONS LINKING ANWAR TO HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITIES, SOMEONE SENT ME THE BOOK ’50 DALIL KENAPA ANWAR IBRAHIM TIDAK BOLEH JADI PERDANA MENTERI’ (’50 REASONS WHY ANWAR IBRAHIM CANNOT BECOME PRIME MINISTER’).

UMMI HAFILDA THE PROSTITUTE’S ULTIMATE FANTASY: SIZE NOT FOREPLAY BUT SHE LOVES ORAL SEX

UMMI HAFILDA THE PROSTITUTE’S ULTIMATE FANTASY: SIZE NOT FOREPLAY BUT SHE  LOVES ORAL SEX Karima el-Mahrough isn’t letting the ongoing media frenzy over her alleged involvement with Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi get her down.   Yes, God has sent us many signs. If not why would Augustine Paul expire at the same time as the sign … Read more “The book was clearly a sensationalist attempt to make money so I did not read it, but the rumours about Anwar refused to go away.”He then cites, “Then in 1997, I received a letter from a woman named Ummi Hafilda Ali. Its contents disturbed me as there were more specific detailed allegations of


No comments:

Post a Comment